This is the first of a series of photos planned for this page. Even if you are NOT
an anti-Obama conspiracy theorist, the photo on the left should serve as an indicator
that all is not well, or even normal, in Obamaville.
We call this photo Obamas Little Photoshop of Horrors.
This photo was copied DIRECTLY from
a photo that is CURRENTLY published on Obama's OFFICIAL Facebook re-election page.
The ONLY alteration we made was to zoom in, do a screen capture, crop that screen
capture, paste it as an inset at the bottom right, and we put a border around the
inset. Then we resized it smaller to fit this page. The larger version is found
here (feel free to copy or link to the larger version of this photo!). Otherwise,
this is 100% unaltered from
the photo published by Obama,
Some claim that the dark hand is due to a shadow. (For example, on
this page, Media Matters makes that claim and then actually makes fun of those
claiming this was photoshopped! Amazing! And we INVITE you to compare their snarky
and sarcastic ramblings to the expert analysis here. HINT: The Frank Marshall Davis
part of this discussion is a side show that MM uses as a convenient
There are four reasons why a shadow and/or lighting could NOT account for
this hand being black:
(1) If you'll look at the zoomed in screen capture, notice the dark shadow at the
top of the hand that the hand is casting upon the shirt. You can even dimly, but
clearly, see stripes of Obama's shirt showing dimly in that shadow, proving that
it is a translucent shadow and NOT more hand. (You cant see through
a hand! In contrast, shadows are often translucent.) The ONLY way the hand
could have cast that shadow upon the shirt is if the hand itself were well lit.
(2) For this hand to have cast such a shadow upon Obama's shirt places most of the
visible portion of this hand slightly, yet distinctly, in front of Obama,
NOT under his armpit. This proves that it was well exposed to room lighting.
(3) If the hand was in a shadow, then how does that shadow magically contour to
the shape of the hand, leaving other adjacent parts of Obama's shirt quite bright?
(4) Notice how fair/white mamas arm is to begin with. It would take extreme
darkness to make that fair a complexion of skin to appear so dark. (Then consider
the 2nd point above where it was proven that most of the visible portion of the
hand was well exposed to room lighting.) Also, the little girl and the
older white man BOTH (a) have skin tones which are NOT nearly so fair-complected
as mama, and (b) both of them are standing VERY close behind Obama, causing them
to be somewhat in Obamas shadow. That makes comparisons of their skin tone
to mamas skin tone an apples-to-oranges comparison.
Notice that the hand is a man-sized hand, and other photos
Obama has released of his mother do NOT show her to have unusually large hands.
Furthermore, Mamas arm is at an angle that is ~45 degree DIFFERENT from the
orientation of the fist. The arm is oriented exactly as if her hand (the one attached
to THAT arm) were clutching a flagpole that is at a 90 degree angle to the ground.
Try this yourself by grabbing a broomstick that is perfectly perpendicular to the
ground and holding it close to your belly. Notice the angle of your hand and arm?
Youll see that this position matches mamas arm, but doesnt match
her black fist. Instead, Mamas fist is actually ~45 degrees off from that
position. Her black fist is angled like a poker player who is hiding her cards from
an opponent who is walking behind her as he returns to the poker table. Each position
is exclusive. You cant have BOTH your clenched fist at the angle shown in
the photo AND still have your arm at the angle shown in the photo, or vice-versa.
That is physiologically impossible. The wrist can move back and forth, and side-to-side, but cannot
rotate (consider a car axles rotation--THAT is what we're talking about!). Such rotation is accomplished at the elbow, rotating the arm and hand in
tandem. (UPDATE: Recently, in the comments section for the original photo posted
on Obamas FB page, someone trying to argue against the analysis found here
inadvertantly/mistakenly pointed out the following: If this hand was tilted at
an angle that matched the arm it is attached to, then the thumb would almost certainly
be visible! Yet the thumb is NOT visible. We are grateful to that person for
helping to prove our point, even if they didn't intend to provide such service.)
Plus, mamas forearm is disproportionately long! You can see that when you
view the panned back (i.e. NOT zoomed in) photo.
Also, notice the very bright light (like outside light) hitting Mamas right
side (our left)... and notice how washed out she looks, as if she were
from a different photo! Perhaps that was copied from a photo taken outside on a
sunny day? Yet, mysteriously, the right side of Obama's face (our left) is somehow
missing that bright light. Instead, the light hitting his face is distinctly LESS
bright and from head-on (i.e. NOT from the side). Yet, according to the positioning
of her black fist, mama is standing mere inches away from Obama! For that to be
legitimate, there would need to be an extremely tall window nearby where bright
sunlight shined through and hit mama, but missed Obama. However, for THAT to happen,
there would ALSO need to be a resulting shadow across the floor, showing that bright
sunlight cutting off between mama and Obama. Such does NOT exist! (The
original photo Obama published, without the inset, shows this better--and
even that attempt at an explanation is already a stretch!) Therefore,
the lighting can ONLY be explained by photoshopping.
Here is why mama is NOT wearing dark gloves: Others claim this
is due to her wearing dark brown gloves. That is also impossible because, when you
look at the close-up, notice that the bare knuckles have a lighter skin tone, as
naturally occurs when a fist is clenched. THAT couldnt happen if this was
due to wearing dark brown gloves, even tight fitting ones. (You can also just barely
make out some tendons and/or veins at the top of the hand, going from the knuckles
to the wrist, shaped in a way that is natural for the back of a bare hand.)
Therefore, this was a photoshopped photo intended to hide the identity of the person
to whom that black hand belongs. Or, another possibility is that they were not trying
to hide the black man, but simply needed this image of Obama copied from another
real photo to create this fake one?
Some have speculated that the hand belongs to Frank Marshall Davis. But even if
that is true, that does NOT prove that Davis is Obamas
real father, as some believe. Certainly, (1) ONLY creepy people need to create fake
family photos, and (2) whoever photoshopped this made a HUGE dumb mistake (or was
trying to get Obama caught?). At the least, this is further evidence
of Obama creating fake family photos to back up an embellished biography. Various
allegations, floating around the Internet, of such photoshopping in official Obama
family photos... now seem to have been validated by this very obviously-photoshopped
Does the existence of this photo PROVE that EVERY conspiracy theory about Obama
is true? OF COURSE NOT! ...but maybe... maybe... this proves that there is more
going on here than many realize. Maybe, at least one of those theories has more
truth to it than many thought possible? Think about it!
is a documentary about abuses and fraud used by Obama operatives in the 2008 Democrat
primary to defeat Hillary Clinton. MANY eyewitness accounts... most from
Hillary-supporting democrats. WATCH...then SHARE... and feel free to copy this text
for your posts about this. Hillary Clinton would have probably won the 2008 Democrat
Primary if it had been conducted fairly! (When you arrive at that site, click the
play icon in the lower left corner of the video box.)